Illinois Initiative on Transparency in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education
The Illinois Initiative on Transparency in Learning and Teaching aims to improve higher education teaching and learning experiences for faculty and students through two main activities:
- promoting students’ conscious understanding of how they learn, and
- enabling faculty to gather, share and promptly benefit from current data about students’ learning by coordinating their efforts across disciplines, institutions and countries.
Since 2010, the pilot phase of the project has involved approximately 7500 students in seventy-two courses at nine universities in five countries. The initiative is prepared to publish early results, incorporate tens of thousands of participants, and seek external funding.
View the current survey form Sign up to participate
Process
Participating instructors implement one or more methods for engaging students in explicit (or transparent) dialogue about learning processes and teaching practices, and later survey students about their learning experiences. Results from many types of courses, institutions, students and faculty are compiled and studied. Participating instructors receive real-time insights about how to improve students’ learning, based on current data gathered from their own students and other, similar students in comparable courses. The data complements traditional student ratings of instruction by offering a measure of how teaching impacts students’ views of their learning, instead of how students rate teaching performance.
Early Results
There are statistically significant benefits to students’ learning when transparent learning and teaching methods are employed. Across all disciplines and at all levels of expertise, the following small changes to teaching are producing significant benefits for students’ current self-reported learning experiences, and for their self-reported future learning benefits. This means that students are identifying skills that they know will help them in their future academic work.
The most effective transparent teaching/learning methods across all disciplines seem to be (according to a one-way ANOVA followed by Games-Howell multiple comparisons test):
- explicitly connecting data about how people learn with course activities at difficult transition points (p < .001)
- discussion of assignments' learning goals and design rationale before students begin each assignment (p < .001)
- in-class debriefing discussions about graded tests and assignments (p < .010)
- grading practices and criteria defined and discussed, with opportunities for students to apply them (p < .029)
Impact
The Transparency Initiative supports faculty and students in implementing high-impact learning and teaching practices while it identifies practices that offer the greatest beneficial impact on students’ learning. As the number of participants increases, we can begin to determine which transparent methods of learning and teaching are most effective with respect to:
- discipline
- course level
- previous educational experience
- self-declared ethnicity
- self-declared major
- which transparent methods benefit which learning goals.
Longer-term results may include higher retention and graduation rates for undergraduate students, including community college students who transfer into four-year institutions, and increased participation of diversely prepared and underrepresented students in Masters and PhD degree programs.
Institutional Review Board Documentation
- Application to Institutional Review Board, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Approvals from Institutional Review Board, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign:
- University of Illinois Institutional Review Board Certification of principal investigator
- Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI) Certification of principal investigator
- Informed Consent Statement for Student Participants
- Informed Consent Statements for Instructor Participants
- Online survey form for participating students (demonstration copy)
- Online registration form for participating instructors (demonstration copy)
Proposed Timeline
- Spring 2009 (completed)
- small trial at University of Chicago
- Summer 2009 (completed)
- data analysis
- validation and revision of surveys
- applications for outside funding
- application for IRB approval
- Fall 2009 (completed)
- U of Illinois trial, 6 courses, various sizes and disciplines, total approx 1500 students
- validation and further revision of surveys
- November, 2009 (completed)
- IRB approval letter, November 18, 2009
- Spring/Summer 2010 (completed)
- begin presenting results at higher education venues
- Spring 2010 – Spring 2014
- add more courses at U of I
- add courses from other universities in the US and abroad
- seek outside funding
- obtain IRB renewals and approvals of amendments
- begin longitudinal studies of impact
- publish results
- Summer 2014
- first round of 5-year-out longitudinal survey
Sign up to participate in the Transparency Initiative. For additional information, please contact:
Mary-Ann Winkelmes, Campus Coordinator for Programs on Teaching and Learning
Office of the Provost and Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs
University of Illinois
807 South Wright Street, Room 534, MC 317
Champaign, IL 61820
(217) 244-5108 fax (217) 265-4183
mawink@illinois.edu